Archive for Low-Cost Laptops

On One Laptop per Child

I saw some rumblings this week about what went wrong with OLPC (One Laptop per Child). Having had, depending on your perspective either a front row seat or being in the ring myself – It is a good but unpopular idea that Nicholas Negroponte did several amazing things and oddly doesn’t get enough credit for them. The first is that he ended the discussion of whether computers belong in children’s hands – they do. And the second which will endure is that he also answered the question of whether inexpensive computers can be useful – they are and their numbers are growing. 50 Million units are predicted in the next 12 months just as Nicholas predicted in 2005 (and was roundly laughed at for). His critics saw only speeches but he gave everything he had, everything he could muster – to this effort and he has succeeded in ways that will long endure. Today more than a million children see the world in ways they would never have, and millions more will in coming months thanks to what Nicholas created.

- Mary Lou

Comments (4)

Our first screens out of the fab!

I’m typing this note on one of the first screens out of the fab, with the backlight turned off, retrofit into an Acer AspireOne netbook, in a poorly lit hotel room in Asia with a crisp high resolution epaper experience. We will be showing off the new screen in private next week: both at Computex in Taipei, Taiwan (June 2-6) and SID Display Week in San Antonio, Texas (May 31-June 5).

If you want to see it: contact: vivek@pixelqi.com

- Mary Lou

Comments (8)

Charlie Rose/Ken Auletta on the OLPC/Intel Breakup

April 16, 2008

When asked about the Intel/OLPC break-up by Charlie Rose on his January 23 2008 broadcast, Ken Auletta of the New Yorker Magazine responds:

“They [Intel] looks at it as a busines model, they probably think that if you sell it too cheap you can’t make any money that way, they [Intel] want cheaper computers and laptop computers but not at $100. I’m sure that is the reason, they don’t say that publically but that’s the reason Intel pulled out [of OLPC]. They are, after all, in business”

Link to video webcast of Charlie Rose 1/23/08 broadcast

Did Ken Auletta get it right?

We now have more data from the first quarter of 2008: The new batch of low-cost compact laptops initially were announced in January 2008 with price targets of around $300. This is 60% higher in cost than the XO laptop price from last year (2007) at $188. In electronics, prices are supposed to go down from year to year – not up. More recent announcements this month from large laptop makers move price estimates higher: drifting upwards to $400 and $500 per compact laptop. HP recently announced a compact notebook product with a $500 target pricetag. This comes as several 14″ or 15″ laptops are already being sold below the $500. Could it be that compact laptops will be a premium product and afford better margins than current conventional size laptops? Is Ken right?

Laptop makers are in a bit of a bind.

When they introduce a new product, they don’t know how many they will sell initially. The direct variable costs of laptop production can drastically increase the per unit price if the laptop doesn’t become a hot product. Essentially, the laptop makers have seen an emerging product category birthed by OLPC (and also Asus’s EEE PC) and want to get in on it. Paradoxically this may raise the price by diluting the field while everyone tries their hand at a little, cute, compact laptop: but at the prices the manufacturers are bantering about this month I wonder if any will move off the shelves.

At Pixel Qi we are focused on the working with the high volume customers that are interested in bringing the price of computers down and delivering laptops to all, and if Ken is right, there are still many other companies that would like to see the cost of laptops drop. It’s already happened with DVD players, calculators and many other consumer electronics, why are laptop prices staying high and how long can it continue?

Comments (1)